Software Solutions: CPU vs. Closed Ecosystem Model

Ashley Lang, CEO of Pragmatic Solutions, believes that the choice between building, purchasing or licensing a Player Account Management (PAM) platform should be based on the strategic needs of the operator. In this interview, she details why her company’s CPU model is a better option than the closed ecosystem model, which limits operators’ options.

According to Lang, the main advantage of the CPU model is flexibility. This model allows operators to integrate various components and features as they see fit, ensuring maximum customization of the platform to individual requirements. Unlike a closed ecosystem, where the operator is forced to use a pre-defined set of tools and solutions, the CPU model provides freedom of choice, which is especially important in a rapidly changing market.

In addition, Lang emphasizes the importance of partnership between the provider and the operator. In the CPU model, Pragmatic Solutions actively collaborates with operators, helping them to adapt the platform to specific needs and implement new features. Lang believes that such collaboration contributes not only to increased efficiency, but also to the creation of unique custom solutions that can give operators a competitive advantage.

Unlike the closed ecosystem model, which dictates its terms and limits the operator in choice, the CPU model allows for a flexible approach to the development and expansion of the platform. Lang notes that this is especially important for those operators who strive to constantly improve their product and quickly respond to market changes.

Thus, Lang is confident that the CPU model from Pragmatic Solutions is a more promising solution for operators in the gaming industry who value flexibility, innovation and partnerships. She concludes that success in the modern gaming business depends on the ability to adapt to changing conditions, and it is the CPU model that gives operators the necessary tools to do so.