California Sports Betting Faces New Ballot Measure Challenge

In a surprising turn of events, the California sports betting arena faces fresh turmoil with the emergence of a new ballot measure. Victor Rocha, a respected voice within the Indian Gaming Association, discusses the potential implications of this development in an exclusive interview with the World Series of Politics.

Rocha doesn't mince words when expressing his views on the new ballot measure. He finds it "insulting" and believes it aims to create divisions between gaming and non-gaming tribes in California. Even a series of amendments fail to improve its acceptability, as Rocha describes it as nothing more than "smoke and mirrors." He adds, "These guys are not listening; they want to go forward and are shocked they don't see Indians running towards them throwing flowers at their fleet."

Contrary to accusations of obstructionism, Rocha explains that gaming tribes are advocating for a deliberate and cautious approach to California sports betting. The support for in-person betting is weak, and enthusiasm for mobile betting is even scarcer. Rocha emphasizes the need for a slow and steady rollout, starting with mobile betting and revisiting the issue later to ensure a safe and sustainable market.

Rocha expresses concerns that the new ballot measure disrupts tribal plans. Tribes had intended to use 2024 as a runway year for a renewed push in 2026. Another potential ballot battle could further delay the progress of California sports betting. Rocha highlights the ongoing culture clash, where a responsible approach to gaming is misconstrued as a hindrance. He and his business partner, Gene Johnson, are actively working to establish a viable sports betting model for the state.

"We have a plan," Rocha asserts to the commercial industry. "Shut up, get in the back seat, let us drive." The fate of California sports betting hangs in the balance as tribes and proponents of the new ballot measure continue to clash over the best path forward.