In the ongoing battle against illegal cockfighting in the United States, Oklahoma stands out as a state facing renewed controversy. Despite the ban on cockfighting since 2004, the Oklahoma Gamefowl Commission (OGC) has found an unexpected ally in Governor Kevin Stitt. The Governor's recent video message to the Commission has raised eyebrows and ignited a debate on animal cruelty and the preservation of cultural heritage.
The Governor's Surprising Support:
In the video, Gov. Stitt not only praised the rich history of gamefowl in Oklahoma but also expressed his desire to protect the state's nearly 5,000 gamefowl farmers. This support is especially significant as it aligns with the OGC's efforts to reduce penalties for those involved in illegal cockfighting. The Governor's enthusiasm for the Commission's goals has left many questioning the ethical implications of supporting an activity widely condemned for its cruelty.
Animal Rights Advocates React:
The Governor's endorsement has drawn sharp criticism from animal rights groups nationwide, emphasizing the cruel nature of cockfighting. Cockfights involve attaching slashers or gaffs—similar to razors or spikes—to the birds' feet, leading to injuries and, in some cases, fatalities. Abegail Cave, a spokesperson for the Governor's office, defended Stitt's stance, asserting that his support is directed towards the agricultural community rather than condoning animal cruelty.
Unanswered Questions:
As controversy mounts, questions linger about the Governor's vision for the OGC's upcoming legislative season. While Stitt's video hinted at future accomplishments, Cave clarified that the Governor has neither endorsed nor reviewed any specific legislation related to reducing penalties for illegal cockfighting. The unfolding debate underscores the delicate balance between cultural heritage, agricultural interests, and the ethical treatment of animals in Oklahoma.